Kilsek Encounter Killer Defender of the Faith: DM
Number of posts : 2557 Age : 52 Hit Points : <b>View of DDM 2.0</b> : <b>View of 4.0</b> : <b>Trade Topic</b> : HERE Reputation : 1 Registration date : 2007-02-17
| Subject: Ed Greenwood Replies Sat Sep 22, 2007 3:31 pm | |
| From a post on Candlekeep: - Quote :
- Ed Greenwood replies to the questions, "But I hope Ed can tell us this much: was this change "his idea"? Or is he along right now mainly to do damage control and try to salvage SOMETHING?"
"Not, it was not my idea.
However, before every scribe or Realms fan everywhere grabs that comment and shouts, “See! They’re ruining the Realms and Ed Greenwood hates what they’re doing!” I would ask everyone to remember that I walked this particular plank back in 1986, when I sold rights to the Realms to TSR, ceding artistic control of the setting. From that day to this, except when I “get in first” to paint the picture of a person, place, or country in the Realms, I have been watching other people do things I might not have ever thought of, or agreed with, to the Realms, and exploring the consequences. It’s what we all (“we” being everyone who works on the Realms, from artists who do line drawings for product interiors to Bob and Elaine as novelists to Eric and George as “lore lords”) DO: poke the Realms in various ways and see what happens. That’s what makes the world seem alive, the constant change. Most humans hate most change. All of us can recall things (the house or neighbourhood or town where we grew up, perhaps) that have changed so much they’re “gone” for us; our remembered thing has been changed too much for us to accept it as the original. This could, yes, happen with the Realms, just as with every other thing. As I said before, we can’t tell yet (yes, that includes me, because I haven’t seen enough of the so-called “new Realms” yet). Yet riding this magnificent horse that gallops in different and often-surprising directions is what I do, and have done for four decades now, two of them in print with TSR and now Wizards. I’m sticking with the horse for now, because I know it and love it and we’ve ridden far together. Bailing right now, at full gallop, would be painful, and I’d be left behind and never get to see what neat new places it will reach. With that said, let me say how moved I am by the anger and upset various scribes have shown here in their postings. You care about the Realms so much. Thank you for that. I understand your hurt. I have felt it too, over and over, down the last twenty years, and believe me I feel it now, as characters get whacked and I face the prospect, that I’ve been fending off with potions of longevity for as long as I could, of others dying of old age before I ever get to really tell their stories. I see the risk Wizards is taking, and sure hope it pays off. Whatever happens, I intend to go on sharing the Realms with gamers and readers for as long as I last. I am hard at work on future Realms goodies now, and am acutely aware of the Border Kingdoms and the unpublished city of Teziir and other things too long neglected. If you need to vent, if you want to talk, I’m here (well, not HERE, but reachable via the Lovely Lady Hooded). I’ve been talking with many of you already about what to do in your own campaigns, and would like to remind everyone that playing up to the Year of Blue Fire can take you ten REAL years (or even longer); my home Realms campaign is proof positive of that. So you can have the luxury of not changing anything right now, and watching the 4e Realms unfold in print, before amking any decision. Lore replies here and elsewhere can still provide guidance in the “Lost Years.” Please remember that although Wizards of the Coast is a business, it is a company staffed by GAMERS. And fiction writers. They care deeply about the products they publish, and would work elsewhere (because there are many, many fields where creative people can get better paid than in gaming) if they didn’t. So, please, ease off on the Evil Empire talk and wait and see what they DO first. I’ll still be here (I hope; certain editors have promised to murder me messily if I blow certain deadlines :} ) . I still care about the Realms; no matter what happens to it, I brought it into the world and want to be there and see what it does. I hope all of you will, too." | |
|
ZER0 Necromancer Supreme
Number of posts : 506 Age : 39 Reputation : 0 Registration date : 2007-07-24
| Subject: Re: Ed Greenwood Replies Sat Sep 22, 2007 7:06 pm | |
| Nice, thanks for posting this Kilsek. | |
|
yack The Drumming Drunkin' DM
Number of posts : 390 Age : 51 <b>View of 4.0</b> : Reputation : 0 Registration date : 2007-04-09
| Subject: Re: Ed Greenwood Replies Tue Sep 25, 2007 7:34 am | |
| Thats awesome never was a fan of Ed's writing in novels but man he is the creator and rocks. | |
|
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Ed Greenwood Replies Mon May 05, 2008 10:21 am | |
| As I've said before, it seem Ed is saying that he's not pleased with every change, but he's willing to give them the benefit of the doubt... |
|
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Ed Greenwood Replies | |
| |
|